The Rt Hon. the Baroness Chakrabarti CBE
Labour
Member of the House of Lords
F
Baroness Chakrabarti's full title is The Rt Hon. the Baroness Chakrabarti CBE. Her name is Sharmishta Chakrabarti, and she is a current member of the House of Lords.
Allowance claims · 2026
Data not yet released for 2026 — the Lords Finance Office publishes monthly CSVs ~6-8 weeks after month-end.
Lords votes · 2026
162 divisions
5 Content(3.1%)
128 Not-Content(79.0%)
29 didn't vote(17.9%)
2026-04-27
Not-Content
58–138
Not-Content
2026-04-23
Not-Content
152–207
Not-Content
2026-04-13
Not-Content
27–89
Not-Content
2026-04-13
Not-Content
30–130
Not-Content
2026-04-13
Not-Content
46–117
Not-Content
2026-04-13
Not-Content
135–154
Not-Content
2026-04-13
Not-Content
65–173
Not-Content
2026-04-13
Not-Content
178–231
Not-Content
2026-04-13
Not-Content
69–332
Not-Content
2026-03-26
Not-Content
115–197
Not-Content
2026-03-26
Not-Content
64–140
Not-Content
2026-03-25
Not-Content
95–137
Not-Content
2026-03-24
Not-Content
70–132
Not-Content
2026-03-24
Not-Content
80–166
Not-Content
2026-03-05
Not-Content
193–143
Content
2026-03-05
Not-Content
194–140
Content
2026-03-05
Not-Content
198–139
Content
2026-03-05
Not-Content
208–142
Content
2026-03-05
Not-Content
214–142
Content
2026-01-12
Not-Content
201–169
Content
2026-01-05
Not-Content
131–127
Content
2026-01-05
Not-Content
194–130
Content
2026-01-05
Not-Content
168–178
Not-Content
2026-01-05
Not-Content
210–131
Content
2026-01-05
Not-Content
132–124
Content
Source: lordsvotes-api.parliament.uk. "Result" shows the headline
Content vs Not-Content tally (including tellers). The Lords doesn't
publish a "didn't vote" attendance roll like the Commons, so the
figure above conflates absence with abstention.
Recent Hansard contributions · latest 25
2026-06-16
Children: Physical Punishment
My Lords, I congratulate my noble friend the Minister on her lifelong professional commitment to children and young people. Might doubters in England be persuaded if we explored replacing the common-law defence of reasonable chastisement with a statutory
2026-06-15
Immigration: Eurodac and SIS II
My Lords, to return to sensible questions about Eurodac rather than the festering sore that is Brexit—or “real Brexit” and leaving the ECHR—given everybody’s interest in multilateral co-operation around these global issues, is it not worth remembering th
My Lords—
My Lords, with apologies for jumping the gun in my enthusiasm, perhaps the Government could comment on this. It is bad enough, although perhaps all too predictable, that there is illicit surveillance by way of, for example, hidden cameras. But what about
2026-06-03
Equality Act 2010: Code of Practice
My Lords, the Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of the interpretation of law as it is, including where there are conflicting statutes. Everyone else must grapple with the consequences. The Government’s equality impact statement suggests that a conseq
2026-06-01
Donations to Political Parties
My Lords, if we are concerned about preventing foreign interference and plugging loopholes, as I think we all are, will my noble friend the Minister consider personal donations—small change such as £5 million to a particular Member of Parliament, for exa
2026-06-01
For Women Scotland Ltd v Scottish Ministers
My Lords, I remember Meta Ramsay as an outstanding public servant who was as kind as she was courageous.
After numerous Lords Questions and a year-long review, we are left with the controversial code essentially unchanged. I ask, in sympathy with thos
2026-05-18
King’s Speech
I add my tribute to today’s maiden speech, and to the predictably exquisite valedictory speeches of the noble Lord, Lord Hennessy of Nympsfield.
There is much to commend in the gracious Speech. However, I urge noble friends in government and all who a
2026-04-16
Southport Inquiry: Prevent Programme
My Lords, in addition to the points that noble Lords around the House have made—about multi-agency co-operation and single-agency lead, and indeed the last comments about the internet, and about violent and misogynistic material in particular—will my nob
2026-04-14
Grenfell Tower Memorial (Expenditure) Bill
My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble and learned Lord, Lord Garnier.
The late great Martin Amis described the sensation of ageing as feeling like breakfast comes around every 15 minutes. Dare I say it but, for some of us in your Lordships’ H
2026-03-23
Ukraine: Reparation
My Lords, I agree with my noble friend the Minister that it will take careful work to construct an appropriate legal structure for the redirection of frozen assets in the future. In the meantime, what is happening to the interest?
2026-03-18
Crime and Policing Bill
I am grateful to all noble Lords, particularly at this witching hour—or beyond.
We are in the wrong place at the moment. I am not going to rehearse the arguments, but I am grateful to my noble friend the Minister for not slamming the door or locking i
2026-03-18
Crime and Policing Bill
2026-03-18
Crime and Policing Bill
My Lords, at this hour I should be sleeping or dancing; I am at least barely standing.
At 10 years, the age of criminal responsibility in England, Wales and Northern Ireland is the lowest in Europe. It is two years below Scotland and four years below
2026-03-18
Crime and Policing Bill
2026-03-18
Crime and Policing Bill
There we go: I was too optimistic, perhaps. None the less, I believe that my noble friend sees the power of the argument or he would not have said what he has said. There are plenty of ways in which the Home Office might consider doing one organisation p
2026-03-18
Crime and Policing Bill
My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords for their approach to such an important debate, in particular those who made a special effort to be succinct with the long night ahead. I remind noble Lords that my amendment on one organisation per order is not
2026-03-18
Crime and Policing Bill
My Lords, more on terrorism, and proscription in particular. Amendment 420 is in my name, and I support Amendment 422B in the name of the noble Viscount, Lord Hailsham, which would beef up parliamentary involvement, and the role of the ISC in particular,
2026-03-17
Fujitsu: Post Office Horizon Case
My Lords, if the litigation strategy rightly suggested by the noble Lord, Lord Clarke of Nottingham, does not bear fruit, I would urge my noble friend and the Government to consider legislation to ensure appropriate legal restitution.
My Lords, I congratulate my noble friend and the working group on a very clear, common-sense definition. Does she agree that it is a very useful public educational tool, not least for signposting actual hard law, such as articles in the human rights conv
2026-03-11
Crime and Policing Bill
My Lords, given what the noble Lord, Lord Strasburger, said about the lateness of the hour, which I think we are all aware of, I want to be very short on my concerns about Amendments 406 and 407. I am sorry not to see the noble Baroness, Lady Cash, in he
2026-03-10
Victims and Courts Bill
My noble friend will forgive me, because this has nothing to do with the rules of the Supreme Court and the county courts. He will forgive me.
I am grateful to all noble Lords for their contributions, not least for being an exemplar of how Report shou
2026-03-10
Victims and Courts Bill
My Lords, I can be short on this important group, because of the detailed scrutiny and cross-party support that I enjoyed in Committee, because of my eminent co-signatories and because Report stage discipline is a courtesy to all noble Lords hoping to do
2026-03-10
Victims and Courts Bill
2026-03-09
Crime and Policing Bill
I agree with much of the discussion about this important group, but I remember that this is Report. While I share particularly the concerns about cumulative disruption, because it is Report, not Committee, I will confine my remarks to one speech in this
Source: hansard.parliament.uk via hansard-api. Snippets shown
verbatim from the search API; click any debate title for the full record.
Register of Interests · 4 entries on file
Declarations under the Lords Code of Conduct. Free text — no monetary values, no hours worked. A declaration that an interest exists, not a claim about its size.
Category 1: Remunerated employment etc.
-
Publication Fees received from Penguin Allen Lane for Human Rights: The Case for the Defence (published 2 May 2024)
registered 2024-04-29 · amended 2025-04-05
-
The Wylie Agency represents the member in connection with her published newspaper and other articles
registered 2016-10-04 · amended 2025-04-05
Category 4: Sponsorship
-
The member receives research support from a PhD student from King’s College London, as part of a training scheme for which the student receives a stipend
registered 2021-10-12 · amended 2025-04-05
-
Door Tenancy (receipt of post and email and occasional use of meeting rooms) from 39 Essex Chambers, London WC2A 1DD
registered 2016-10-04 · amended 2025-04-05
Source: UK Parliament Members API (Lords register). Refreshed weekly.
Read the full
Lords Code of Conduct
for what each category covers and the disclosure thresholds.
Party history
2016-09-06 → present
Labour
current
Government posts
None recorded.
Opposition posts
2016-10-06 → 2020-04-06
Shadow Attorney General
Committee memberships
2021-04-14 → 2024-01-31
Justice and Home Affairs Committee
2024-01-24 → 2024-09-16
Statutory Inquiries Committee
2024-01-31 → present
Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee
2026-01-27 → present
Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Contact
Parliamentary office
chakrabartis@parliament.uk
020 7219 5353 · House of Lords, London, SW1A 0PW
020 7219 5353 · House of Lords, London, SW1A 0PW
APPGs (2026) · 0 active officership(s) · 1 historic
Not currently an officer of any active APPG. Was officer of 1 group(s) historically — those rotated off in later snapshots.
Written parliamentary questions · 2026
No written questions tabled in 2026.
Bills sponsored & supported · 2026
0 bills
0 as lead sponsor
0 as supporter
No bills sponsored or supported in 2026.
Source: UK Parliament Bills API. "Lead" sponsor is the
primary mover (sortOrder = 1); "Supporter" rows are
members of either House who
backed the bill at introduction. Year is the bill's first-reading
date.
Historic bills (all-time)
0 bills
0 as lead sponsor
0 as supporter
No bills sponsored or supported on record.
Same source as the year-scoped panel above, but unconstrained by
year. The "Sponsored" tag = lead sponsor; "Supported" = backed at
introduction. Sorted newest first.